Burnout Syndrome in Health Sciences University Faculty
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Burnout syndrome in educators can represent professional exhaustion that significantly affects personnel, especially in the health sciences field, where job demands, emotional burden, and institutional pressure are high and abundant. Objective: To analyze the influence of institutional factors and educational resilience strategies on the onset of burnout syndrome in health sciences faculty. Method: A qualitative documentary study was conducted, based on a review of scientific literature published between January 2020 and August 2025. The search was carried out in international databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Google Scholar) using MeSH/DeCS descriptors such as burnout syndrome, academic staff, medical education, institutional factors, resilience, and higher education. Results: The experiences of university faculty regarding Burnout are explored, delving into the institutional factors that trigger it and the resilience strategies that emerge as coping mechanisms. A considerable prevalence of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment is evident, primarily associated with academic overload, lack of recognition, scarce participation in institutional decisions, and the absence of psychosocial support programs. Burnout syndrome in health sciences university faculty is defined. Conclusion: It is important to address burnout syndrome in faculty as a multidimensional situation that requires responses contributing to improved university management.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Tabares-Díaz YA, Martínez-Daza VA, Matabanchoy-Tulcán SM. Síndrome de Burnout en docentes de Latinoamérica. Univ Salud [Internet]. 2020 [citado 17 ago 2025];22(3):265-79. Disponible en: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/usalud/article/view/4458
Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3rd ed. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C. Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Dev Int. 2009;14(3):204–20.
Lovo J. Síndrome de Burnout: un problema moderno. Entorno. 2020;(70):110-20.
Pujol-de Castro A. Prevalencia del síndrome de burnout en médicos que trabajan en España: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Gac Sanit. 2024;38:100371.
Caballo Avendaño F. Prevención del síndrome de burnout en enfermería en pandemia covid-19: una revisión sistémica. Rev Salud Publica. 2021;2:48-59.
Cortez-Silva D. Satisfacción laboral y síndrome de burnout en docentes durante el confinamiento por la pandemia COVID-19. Propós Represent. 2021;9(3):e1124.
Gu Q, Day C. Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teach Teach Educ. 2007;23(8):1302–16.
Ghahramani S, Jahangiri R, Azimi M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of burnout among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:758849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.758849
Kunzler AM, et al. Interventions to foster resilience in nursing staff: a systematic review and meta-analyses of pre-pandemic evidence. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;134:104312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104312
Seo JH, Bae HO, Kim BJ, Huh S, Ahn YJ, Jung SS, et al. Burnout of faculty members of medical schools in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(9):e74. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e74
Paradis KC, Kerr EA, Griffith KA, Cutter CM, Feldman EL, Singer K, et al. Burnout Among Mid-Career Academic Medical Faculty. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(6):e2415593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15593
Guedez Salas Y. Síndrome de burnout: enfermedad invisible entre los profesionales de la salud. Enferm Clin. 2021;53:102.
Lauracio C. Síndrome de burnout y desempeño laboral en el personal de salud. Rev Innova Educ. 2020;2(4):556-68.
World Health Organization. Mental health and psychosocial well-being in the workplace. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
Giler-Zambrano R, Loor-Moreira G. Síndrome de Burnout en docentes universitarios en el contexto de la pandemia COVID-19. Dom Cien. 2022;8(1):352-74.